This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TDC1000-C2000EVM: Piezo electric ice monitoring

Part Number: TDC1000-C2000EVM
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TDC1000, , TUSS4440, BOOSTXL-TUSS4440, MSP-EXP430F5529LP

Hi,

I allow my self to contact you because we would like use TDC1000 sensor with piezo electric cell to monitoring ice water with a good resolution (below 1mm). It is only possible for us to monitoring the ice while with piezo electric cell (or other technology) submerged in the ice.

First, we following your recommandations in this document : https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snaa266a/snaa266a.pdf?ts=1686556868607&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Ftool%252FTDC1000-C2000EVM

We used the evaluation board TDC1000-C2000EVM with the software TDC1000_C2000_EVM and piezo electric cell : https://www.steminc.com/PZT/en/piezo-ceramic-disc-1-mhz

We leave these default settings : /resized-image/__size/1617x1228/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/1023/tdc1000_5F00_c2000_5F00_evm_5F00_setup.png

First, we trying to monitoring liquid (water). We make housing with mix of acrylic (on the top only) and PETG like below : 

On the housing, the piezo electric cell is mounting on the top on acrylic using cyanoacrylate and on the bottom, we use hot glue. Also, we used hot glue to to guarantee a watertightness of the case. We testing in cube with 5 cm of the water and it is work.

After, we placed the cube on freezer at the temperature between -5°C and -7°C during 72 hours. We placed this piezo electric cell on the top of the ice with our housing and add water until they are water surround the housing and not above. After 24h, the piezo cell is fixed on the ice :

We add water above this cell (1mm to 10mm), is it possible to monitoring. After 24 hours, this liquid water transform to ice and we can't have measure.

What is your recommandations to monitoring ice (water) ? It is necessary to change the settings of your software to have results ?

Thanks in advance for your help. Kind Regards.

  • Hey Gautier,

    What exactly are you trying to measure with the sensor with it encased/submerged in ice?  Are you trying to measure the depth/thickness of the ice?  Or are you trying to determine when the water transitioned from liquid to solid?  

    Can the transducer not be mounted to the bottom of the acrylic container on the outside, or on the top?  More similar to Figure 5. Fluid Level Measurement Using Ultrasonic

    Regards,

    Jacob

  • Hey Jacob,

    We trying to measure the depth/thickness of the ice. We goal is to able to measure that with a resolution below 1 mm. We have already testing the transducer to the bottom of the acrylic container on the outside. And it don't work. Also, in real application, it is not possible for us to mounted the transducer outside because this measure is for monitoring the depth/thickness of the ice for ice rink. And first, we want to find a solution submerged on the ice.

    Do you think is it possible ? If yes, what is your recommandations for this application ?

  • Hey Gautier,

    Ahh okay I understand.  Hopefully the transducer will eventually be mounted in a known location in the ice so you can measure only upward to get a consistent reading.  Or you could use two transducers and use one to measure to the bottom of the ice rink and another to measure up toward the air to sense the top of the ice and combine those readings to get the total thickness.  Your transducer will ideally need to be parallel to the surface you're measuring which might be a challenge with your prototype setup.  

    Our ultrasonic expert is out today but will return tomorrow morning, I'll have him weigh in on if he thinks this is possible and if he has better recommendations. 

    I did some research on threads about measuring ice with ultrasonic, but didn't find much to help us:

    So let's wait until tomorrow when my team's ultrasonic expert can weigh in.  

    Regards,

    Jacob

  • Hey Gautier,

    Thanks for posting to the forum! I would not recommend the TDC1000 for this application. The reason being is that the TDC1000 produces a 5V signal to drive the transducer and while this works great for water when measuring solid object a significant portion of the signal does not make it through the object in this case the ice.

    A larger voltage would maybe ensure you are getting more signal through to measure the ice but still might be difficult to do if you have a tank and then also a cube of ice to propagate the signal through. My main concern is that if there is an airgap between the ice at the tank that means the signal must propagate through, tank wall, air/water gap, then ice cube and perform the same path back. All the changes in transmission medium are very challenging to overcome with ultrasonic device.

    Here is an FAQ on what devices we recommend for various applications: https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/748143/faq-ultrasonic-sensors

    Assuming there was not air/water gap, my recommendation would be to try this with the TUSS44x0 devices which allow you to generate a larger signal. The TUSS4440 is the recommended device here because the transformer can help you generate very large voltages, but the downside it cannot be driven at 1MHz for a better resolution. I think its important to identify if a larger transducer voltage would help you make  through the tank wall and the largest ice cube thickness requirement you may have for your system.

    I hope this helps let me know if you have any questions!

    Best,

    Isaac

  • Hey Isaac,

    Thanks for your help and for this informations. We will trying with the TUSS4440 to monitoring the depth/thickness of the ice. First, we trying to have a result with the evaluation board : https://www.ti.com/tool/BOOSTXL-TUSS4440

    For your information the thickness of the ice do not exceed 40mm. Do you have any recommandation for piezo cell to have a better resolution as possible (below 1 mm) ? What references do you prefer ? Also, do you have a design guide to integrate this cell in a case fully waterproof ?

    Thanks in advance for all your help. Kind Regards.

  • Hello Gautier,

    No worries please let me know if you have any other questions regarding the TUSS4440.

    The resolution  is dependent on the frequency of the transducer and the speed of sound in the medium, you can use this formula to calculate the estimated resolution achievable based on your conditions: Resolution = (1/frequency)*speed of sound

    Keep in mind that the higher the frequency the better the resolution but the less energy that is carried by the signal it can become attenuate much easily. There are transducer manufacturers that sell sealed transducers that are waterproof. I am not sure who sells them but here is a link of transducers we have used in the past: https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/slac787

    You may be able to check the datasheets or with the manufacturers to see if they provide sealed options.

    Best,

    Isaac

  • Hi Isaac,

    Thanks a lot for this informations.

    We just received the evaluation board BOOSTXL-TUSS4440 and MSP-EXP430F5529LP and followed the instructions at this link : https://www.ti.com/tool/BOOSTXL-TUSS4440

     

    We use the UTR-1440K-TT-R cell that comes with the evaluation board. 

    Also, we follow the user guide (https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slau822a/slau822a.pdf?ts=1687177995015&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Ftool%252FBOOSTXL-TUSS4440) to properly connect the board and setup the software GUI. We flashing the program on the MSP-EXP430F5529LP and we have "Device Status" below :

    The status of "VDRV Rdy" is 0. For normal operation this state should be 1.

    We tried changing the JUMPER POSITIONS on the evaluation board BOOSTXL-TUSS4440 to use these Power Modes :

    The status of "VDRV Rdy" stay at 0. Can you tell me how resolve this problem please ?

    Thanks in advance for your help. Kind Regards.

  • Hello Gautier,

    Thanks for the question, just as a quick note if you have a question regarding a different device other than the one listed on this thread we typically recommend creating a new post to help other users find solutions to their problems much easier.

    As far as your VDRV RDY error, have you changed the status of the VDRV_HI_Z in the VDRV_CTRL register yet? If VDRV is in Hi-Z it will show as an error because the internal regulator for VDRV will be disabled in this configuration. I would recommend changing the jumper positions back to the USB only configuration if you are not using external power and change the status of VDRV to confirm that the error goes away.

    Let me know if there are still any questions about this.

    Best,

    Isaac