This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

AWRL6432: Antenna coupling in AWRL6432 is not linear/constant across frames

Part Number: AWRL6432

Hi Team,

We are using MMWAVE_L_SDK_05_03_00_02 SDK. We implemented antenna coupling algorithm same as 3.5 SDK considering change in radar-cube format, still we are seeing near points.

To debug this issue, observed det-matrix output: We saw antenna coupling is applied perfectly for some contiguous frames, after that the det-matrix power from near range bins are keep on increasing.

PFA the screenshot of det-matrix if there is no antenna coupling:

PFA the screenshot of det-matrix after antenna coupling applied for 5 range bins:(this is observed for some frames)

PFA the screenshot of det-matrix with increased power from near range bins even after applying antenna coupling 

We observed the mean values are always constant through out all frames

Please help us here, why this behavior is observed

Regards

M Girish Veerendra

  • Hi Girish,

    Thanks for posting. I wanted to post a few more details not captured here to make sure our understanding is correct. Could you please confirm or elaborate on the bullets below?

    • You have removed static clutter removal from your algorithm and you are implementing this because peaks near the sensor are being detected more with this change
    • The antenna coupling suppresses the power of the near range bins for about 10 seconds before this behavior is occurs
    • When you observe the radar cube/the raw data from the ADC, you are not seeing this behavior (i.e. the power does not increase for the near range bins after ~10 seconds)
    • You are taking these measurements at boresight with no objects present for about 2 meters in an anechoic chamber 

    Thanks again,

    Clinton

  • Hi Girish,

    Following up on this. Here are some additional questions/comments:

    1. The behavior you are showing in these images is expected, given that you are not performing clutter removal. Did you perform these same tests on the previous design and not observe the power increase over time for the near bins?
    2. Is there a reason you are not performing clutter removal? We would recommend including this.
    3. We typically discard the first several bins when performing CFAR to remove this antenna coupling effect. Could you operate this way as well? If not, could you describe what you are trying to detect so close to the sensor?

    Thanks,

    Clinton

  • Hi Clinton,

    Please find my answers below:

    You have removed static clutter removal from your algorithm and you are implementing this because peaks near the sensor are being detected more with this change

    Yes, We disabled Static clutter removal algorithm in order to see whether antenna coupling is really removing these high peaks.

    The antenna coupling suppresses the power of the near range bins for about 10 seconds before this behavior is occurs

    For some frames(not exactly 10secs) we saw the peak less than CFAR thresholds

    When you observe the radar cube/the raw data from the ADC, you are not seeing this behavior (i.e. the power does not increase for the near range bins after ~10 seconds)

    We observed only ADC data of the last chirp that power is almost same for 1st frame's last chirp and 800th frame last chirp. We have not looked into radarCube and whole ADC data.

    You are taking these measurements at boresight with no objects present for about 2 meters in an anechoic chamber 

    Yes, you are correct.

    The behavior you are showing in these images is expected, given that you are not performing clutter removal. Did you perform these same tests on the previous design and not observe the power increase over time for the near bins?

    We never observed this behavior in previous SDK like 3.5,3.6. In 6443 & 6843, when static clutter is disabled we have not seen any near points after applying antenna coupling.

    Is there a reason you are not performing clutter removal? We would recommend including this.

    Customer requirement is that they need to detect static objects without near points. They verified this setting(static clutter removal disabled and antenna coupling enabled) on 6443 and it is absolutely working fine

    We typically discard the first several bins when performing CFAR to remove this antenna coupling effect. Could you operate this way as well? If not, could you describe what you are trying to detect so close to the sensor?

    Yes, But as a customer requirement we need to detect any obstacles that are blocking the sensor, so we need to detect points close to sensor.

    Regards

    M Girish Veerendra

  • Hi Girish,

    Thanks for the follow up. We'll wait to provide more feedback once you are able to perform the additional testing discussed.

    Thanks again,

    Clinton