This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
As the total number of virtual antennas in AWR1642 is 8 and in AWR1443 the number is 12. So, which will be the best suited EVM for Mid-Range and Long- Range applications in autonomous driving, and why?
As on page no. 6 under AWR1642 use case in the white paper 'www.ti.com/.../spyy006.pdf' it is mentioned that awr1642 is used as a short range radar only. Is awr1443 a better option over awr1642 for the mid and long range aplications ?
Regards
Hi Kyle,
Can i use TMS570LS0432 or TMS320F28069 as the host processor with AWR1243?
Regards
Rahul Kumar
Quoting Kyle Cousino :
> A Message from the TI E2E™ Community
>
> Kyle Cousino [http://e2e.ti.com/members/4381542] replied
> to AWR1443BOOST: BEST SUITED mmwave sensor EVM for Long-range and
> Mid-Range automotive application
> [http://e2e.ti.com/support/sensor/mmwave_sensors/f/1023/p/673761/2481328#2481328].
>
> In this type of use case, it would be recommended to use a cascaded
> AWR1243 [http://www.ti.com/product/AWR1243] setup with an external
> host processor. Here is some more information about a cascaded
> AWR1243 [http://www.ti.com/product/AWR1243] setup.
>
> www.youtube.com/watch [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C49lhsiIrso]
>
> www.ti.com/.../swra574a.pdf [http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra574a/swra574a.pdf]
>
> Please let us know if you have any additional questions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kyle
>
> You received this notification because you subscribed to the forum.
> To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here
> [http://e2e.ti.com/support/sensor/mmwave_sensors/f/1023/t/673761/mute].
>
> Flag
> [http://e2e.ti.com/support/sensor/mmwave_sensors/f/1023/p/673761/2481328?AbuseContentId=58f8a0cf-dbcc-4915-85a9-3a4a2863d1cb&AbuseContentTypeId=f586769b-0822-468a-b7f3-a94d480ed9b0&AbuseFlag=true] this post as
> spam/abuse.