This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Good day for all. Recently I updated CCS from 8 to 11 version. During my project building there was a windows error occured:
Signature of the problem:
Name of the event of the problem: APPCRASH
Application name: cg430.exe
Applicatin version: 21.6.0.0
Application timestamp: 60b0659c
Module name of the problem: ntdll.dll
Module version of the problem: 6.1.7601.23714
Timestamp of the problem module: 58bf89e8
Exception code: c00000fd
Exception offset: 000000000004f42f
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1
Language code: 1049
Extra info 1: edaf
Extra info 2: edaf31470ab0549e8bae3de7f29bf714
Extra info 3: 821f
Extra info 4: 821f6a067ef88b0b2493011ba4b74761
According to "How to Submit a Compiler Test Case" I uploaded the case:
Thank you for notifying us of this problem, and submitting a detailed test case. I cannot reproduce the exact same result, but I do see an unexpected error. I filed the entry EXT_EP-10733 to have this investigated. You are welcome to follow it with that link.
Thanks and regards,
-George
To understand why I marked this thread resolved, please see the first FAQ in the CCS Forum Usage Guidelines.
Thanks and regards,
-George
A workaround just got added to EXT_EP-10733.
To apply the workaround in your specific case, change the function ussHandle as follows ...
void ussHandle(DWORD*regAddr){ volatile DWORD usd_begin = (DWORD) usdLeaBunker; volatile DWORD usd_end = (DWORD) usdLeaBunker+2*372; volatile DWORD gus_begin = (DWORD) gUSSLEATempMemBlock; volatile DWORD gus_end = (DWORD) gUSSLEATempMemBlock+2*372; if((*regAddr >= (gus_begin + 0x50) && (*regAddr < gus_end - 0x50))){ if(ussActive != 0) *regAddr = *regAddr - gus_begin - 0x50 + usd_begin; }else if((*regAddr >= usd_begin) && (*regAddr < usd_end)){ if(ussActive == 0) *regAddr = *regAddr - usd_begin + gus_begin + 0x50; } }
I realize that, in your source code, this function probably uses a lot of #define macros. So, the actual code changes will be different. Still, I hope these suggested changes are helpful.
Thanks and regards,
-George