This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

What L is better in RX matching: Wirewound or Multilayer

Genius 3985 points

Hi,

TI recommends wirewound-L in all design notes (CC112x etc.). This is obvious, specially in high power areas.

Now I've seen an article describing that multilayer 0603 should be used in all LNA circuits to achieve max. sensivity.

Could you guys from TI comment and tell me your experience?

regards

GG

  • Hi,

    For lowest insertion loss, wire-wound inductors will have better performance than multi-layer inductors. Greater conducted harmonic attenuation can be achieved with wire-wound but they are also "good" unwanted antennas as well. If you have a design that is susceptible for radiated emissions, then mutli-layer inductors could prove to be better than wire-wound due to the unwanted antenna effect.

    Wire-wound inductors will generally have a higher Q as well so if this is critical for your match, then this could be the main reason for choosing wire-wound for say an LNA, etc. Not all ref designs use WW-inductors, the China ref design only uses multi-layer inductors due to cost reasons.

    Please share the article if possible.

    The ref designs from the performance line (CC112x etc) have great sensitivity levels and by using wire-wound inductors we gain a fraction of a dB better performance.
  • Thx. Richard.
    I got it from a german translation of an englich article. Just for being accurate I digged for the original and found, it's a 'tranmission error': the orginal article is coherent to what you stated.
     

  • Ok. Thanks for sharing the article.

    //Richard