This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

INA 226 shunt voltage gain error/shunt input impedance

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: INA226

Hi,

we implemented the INA226 power monitor into a measurement application. The shunt input has been
been equiped with the low-pass R=10 Ohm, C= 100 nF (as recommended at page 12, in fig. 22 at the data sheet).


Regarding to the datasheet, selecting there resistors has minimal effect to the accuracy.
The datasheet provides, that the max. shunt voltage gain error is 0.1% of the fullscale.
Our measurements exposed errors > 0.2% FS.

A failure analysis has revealed, that there is a not negligible voltage drop at the resistors.
Based on the assumption, that the input impedance of the shunt input is the same as the Vbus input impedance 830 kOhm there should'n be any significant voltage drops at the LP-filter resistors.

The shunt input impedance seems to be around 12k but there is no specification relating the shunt input impedance.
This leads to the conclusion, that the Vbus and the shunt input impedance are identically.

Our problem is, that even long wires from the shunt resistor are affecting the measurement accuracy of the shunt input.

We performed the reference measurements with a Fluke 715 voltage calibrator and a Keithley 2001 DMM connected directly to the
LP-filtered input of the INA226 shunt input.

Originally we decided to use the INA226 power monitor for our measurement applications due to the fantastic A/D specs and so a
calibration of seemed to be unnecessary, because we wanted to avoid a calibration in any case.

Could someone on part of TI please confirm, that the input impedances of Vbus and Shunt are different and why this particular information has not been published?

Thank you.

Dimitri

  • Hello Dimitri,

    The differential input impedance is typically 8K ohms to the shunt.

    We have had similar questions when measuring small shunt resistors.  The layout, shunt pad size and soldering method was a significant part of the measurement error. 

    What size is the shunt resistor that you are using?  Can you send me the layout of where the Kelvin connections to the shunt are?  Have you measured the voltage directly at the pins 10 and 9 to compare to what the output is being calculated to?

    Regards,

    Jamieson Wardall

    Sensing Applications

  • Hello Jamieson,


    the INA226 is implemented inside a module for the measurement and monitoring of external voltages and currents. The actual shunt resistor, below depicted in fig.1 ( around 0.01ohm) is a wired component outside the module, with various wire lengths.

    We measured the voltage directly at pins 9 & 10 and have found that the error is a result of the voltage drop at the filter resistors and the wires/lines from the external shunt resistor to the shunt input of the INA226 at pin 9 & 10.

    We replaced the 10 Ohm filter resistors and inserted 0 Ohm resistors instead. The result was significantly better, but the wires still produce a certrain voltage drop, due to the relatively low differential shunt input impedance of just 8K .

    Fig.1: Shunt resistor

    Regards,

    Dimitri

  • Hello Dimitri,

    We should take this off line as I would like to see your layout and go in-depth.  My email is jw@ti.com.

    Regards,

    Jamieson Wardall