This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
My customer in now evaluating their board using TPS62400, and they found the over/undershoot voltage
at sw-node (measuring with spring grounding probe. please see the attached waveform.)
and they also found the over/undershoot voltage at sw-node on the TPS62400 EVM.
In the TPS62400 D/S P15 Figure29 and 30, we can see them as well.
So, Is the over/undershoot voltage at sw-node inherent problem in TPS62400?
or is it no problem? (especially undershoot, seems to be below the absolute minimum voltage for Sw_node(-0.3V))
Thanks
Go
Please see this app note, located on the product page: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva494a/slva494a.pdf
Hi, Chris
Thanks for the info.
So if the over/undershoot is seen in the TPS62400 EVM with measuring proper measurement technique,
Does it mean that there are some improvement of layout on TPS62400 EVM?
Go
I'm not sure that I understand your question. The app note should have conveyed that such over/under shoots are normal and expected and not an issue.
Sorry for the confusion.
See in the App note Figure 6 , there are smaller over/under shoots in TPS62240 EVM,than those in TPS62400 EVM that the customer measured.
So I think there are some difference of layout between these 2 EVMs, and there are some improvements of layout in TPS62400 EVM,
if these waveforms were measured properly.
Those are different devices, so their performance varies. But the basic behavior is the same for all bucks, even it is manifested with slightly different voltages/timings, etc.