Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK6C Hello!
I am looking for alternatives to the following clocking devices: ECS-5032MV-245.7-BN-TR and ECS-.327-7-16-TR. When looking on ti.com, I found that there were no devices that were offered that got down into the…
Hi Thanh,
Correct, LMK61E0M or LMK6C would be the best device we have for an LVCMOS oscillator. LMK6C is a fixed-frequency part so it would be easier and cheaper to design in. LMK61E0M requires programming so it's a little more complicated but it would…
Part Number: LMK00105 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK6C , CDCM6208 hello,
i have to update an board, some parts are eol. i am not the designer from the board, that is the reason why i check every ic and the passive components.
at the board is an LMK00105…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK6C Hello,
I wanted to check whether there is a TI cross to the Multicomp MCSJK-7U crystal resonator. Specifically, I am interested in crossing against the PN MCSJK-7U-12.00-12-10-80-B-10. See datasheet for reference: https…
Part Number: LMK6D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK6C , Hi,
LMK6C (CMOS) specification is under condition on adding 2.2pF capacitor. How about LMK6D (LVDS)?? What is output load capacitor on LMK6D (LVDS) devices?
I understand LMK6D (LVDS) specification…
Aravind,
An LVCMOS clock should be able to hit the voltage requirements at this frequency - we have oscillator products, such as the LMK6C, that are LVCMOS oscillators that meet this requirement.
Thanks,
Kadeem
Hi Kurumi,
I looked through the oscillator jitter requirements for TUSB9261 and I believe LMK6C meets these specs. I'm not sure how JTF 1 sigma value is being calculated, but it does pass the peak-peak jitter requirements with a good margin.
Regards…
Hi Marco,
I'd recommend taking a look at our LMK6C portfolio. It is the industry's first BAW based oscillator. It can support the frequencies you mentioned. The voltage specs are 1.8 V, 2.5V, and 3.3V whereas these Pletronics oscillators can go from…