Dear sir,
If i have to design a fourth order LPF filter oof 350 KHz by cascading two LPF ,what should be the frequency of two LPF filter?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear sir,
If i have to design a fourth order LPF filter oof 350 KHz by cascading two LPF ,what should be the frequency of two LPF filter?
Thanks for the reply.
I have designed fourth order LPF filter theoretically by choosing two individual second order filter.The cutoff frequency i have chosen for both filters are 350khz but i have taken different quality factor and coefficients .i.e ,(1+a1s+b1s^2).
coefficient a1 =1.8478 a2=0784
b1=b2=1
q1 =0.54
q2=1.39
is this method correct?
Well without recreating the legacy pole location algorithms, you might peruse this classic treatment in the context of the original BurrBrown FilerPro program,
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sbfa001c/sbfa001c.pdf
The current TI online link Marek included is based off of this,
I myself use the old FilterPro program to find target poles then implement using more modern RC solution flows.
There is a mass of material behind that, but here is one article elucidating the min GBW product solution flow - what Filter are you trying to achieve?
Thanks for sharing the user guide of filter design.
my problem statement is given as follows
Design a fourth order butter worth filter with cut off of 350KHz.
by using ti design tool i got design values.
But i want to know how those values is selected?
So Arjun,
You are embarking down a well worn path of classic polynomials - A lot of this I think was developed in the 1920's on and then applied over the years - the reference book most folks used from the 1980's on is here - Ch. 3 I think is what you want,
https://d1.amobbs.com/bbs_upload782111/files_32/ourdev_573166.pdf
I know when I was developing the Intersil online active filter tool you have to constrain your solutions to a finite set of well defined shapes and then maximum order - I limited that to 6th order in the tool I developed (that was from looking at the extreme RC accuracy required as you go to higher order asking for extreme Q's) At that point, the target 2nd and 1st order pole locations emerge from a set of look up tables - from info that is in works like the one above.