This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

AMC1350-Q1: AMC1350 output RC filter and stability

Part Number: AMC1350-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AMC1350, , TINA-TI

Hello,

I am planning to connect a RC filter on the output of AMC1350.

The spec says that if R=0 the max. "OUTP to OUTN" cap is 250pF.

How can I determined the maximum capacitor with higher resistors (e.g. R = 100 or 1k) ?

Thanks

  • Hi Frederic,

    I'm not seeing what you are referring to where the 'spec says that if R=0 the max. "OUTP to OUTN" cap is 250pF'.  We do have a max capacitive load of 250pF between OUTp and OUTn shown in section 6.3 (page 4, AMC1350-Q1 datasheet).  This is just a limitation of the device's ability to drive a capacitive load.  Once there are series resistors in place, your 100 ohm for example, you should be able to have capacitor values well into the 100s of nano farad range.  The limitations would fall on the rest of the signal chain after the isolation amplifier more so than the AMC1350 itself.  What are you driving downstream from the AMC1350?

  • Hello Tom,

    About" Once there are series resistors in place, your 100 ohm for example, you should be able to have capacitor values well into the 100s of nano farad range."

    How can I be sure that for example R=100ohm + C=100nF will not be an issue (stability) for AMC1350?

    Thanks,

    Frederic

  • Hi Frederic,

    We have PSpice for TI and TINA-TI models that you can use to simulate the output of the AMC1350 with those values of RC components.  The models are located here: https://www.ti.com/product/AMC1350#design-tools-simulation

  • Hello Tom,

    Thanks. I wasn't sure the spice model was good enough to check the stability with a capacitive load.

    I will simulate this using pspice.

    Most amplifiers have a chart for "capacitive load stability" that provides R vs C limits. It would be nice to include this in spec in the future.

    Thanks,

    Frederic

  • Thank you for the comment, we'll consider adding a similar table.