Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV3701, TLV3702, TLV3704
Hi team
TI.com shows same FIT = 0.4 for TLV3701(1 Ch)/TLV3702(2 CH)/TLV3704(4 Ch) comparators.
I think the FIT calculated by TI.com is based on 1 Channel.
user has to sum all components's FIT on critical safety path populated on board level, to meet the targeted board level ASIL.
so, the following examples are correct ?
just to get confirm. thanks.
[Q1] so if he uses TLV3701, he has to use FIT = 0.4 for TLV3701 because it has the only one channel and he will use the only one channel on board level.
so if he uses TLV3702, he has to use FIT = 0.8 ( 0.4 x 2) for TLV3702 because it has two channels inside and he will use all 2 channels on board level.
so if he uses TLV3704, he has to use FIT = 1.6 (0.4 x4) for TLV3704 because it has 4 channels inside and he will use all 4 channels on board level.
[Q2] so if he uses TLV3702, he has to use FIT = 0.4 for TLV3702 because it has two channels inside and he will use only one channels on board level.
so if he uses TLV3704, he has to use FIT = 0.4 for TLV3704 because it has 4 channels inside and he will use only one channels on board level.
[Q3] so if he uses TLV3704, he has to use FIT = 0.8(0.4 x 2) for TLV3704 because it has 4 channels inside and he will use only two channels on board level.
