Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TINA-TI, VCA821
Hi,
Gain accuracy is specified as below;
Though I simulate Gain accuracy on TINA-TI, it is not matched with specification.
Which is accurate TINA-TI or specification?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Michael-san,
I think that above TINA-TI result is worse than specification.
What do you think?
Kuramochi
Ok Tadahiko-san,
It looks like the model is producing a gain of 0.79dB instead of 0dB at Vg = -1V midrange. So that is not the typical +/-0.4dB gain error in the data sheet, but within the worst case 25C of +/-2.2dB. I tested 0V and -2V and in each case just a little less than the +/-40dB gain expected - I think it is working, the absolute can acccuracy for this part is not that good - if you need better, look at the VCA821
Also you need to move the source to be in series with the 20ohm if you want bias current cancellation,
The models generally do not model temp drift effects, this one might do something as it is transistor based, but it was likely not tested.
Michael-san,
Thank you for your comment.
I wait TIer's response.
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
Currently, we do not model temperature dependent characteristics in TINA-TI macro models. Please refer to the datasheet for this information.
Best regards,
Sean