• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 1372 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Interfacing the CDC3S04 to the LMK03000

Alan Langman
Prodigy 20 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CDC3S04, LMK03000, LMK00105, LMK00304, CDCLVC1104, SN65LVDS105, LMH7220

Hi,

I am using a CDC3S04 to distribute a 26MHz TCXO clipped sinewave clock to multiple devices, including the LMK03000. What is the best way for the CDC3S04 to drive the LMK03000. The CDC3S04 specs a maximum ouput load of 30pF (approx 200ohm at 26MHz). The evaluation board for the device is matched for 50 ohm; what effect does this have on the signal? I can't find too much information on the input characteristics of the OSCin for the LMK03000, other than one can drive it single ended; looks like the clock should be able to drive a 50 ohm load and  the power levels for best performance are prescribed by Figure 16; although the graph for singled ended only starts at 50MHz.

I did notice that the eval board for the LMK03000 uses a 1:2 impedance RF transformer.

Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Best

Alan

 

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 28540 points

    Hello,

    The input can be considered high impedance and capacitive.

    At < 30 MHz, the input impedance of OSCin is greater than 3.3 kohm = | 2500 -j 2200 |

    At < 30 MHz, the input impedance of OSCin* is just less that 4 kohm = | 3400 -j 1800 |

    Alan Langman said:
    The evaluation board for the device is matched for 50 ohm; what effect does this have on the signal?

    This helps match the 50 ohm RF trace to the input.

    Alan Langman said:
    I am using a CDC3S04

    Is there a reason you are using a sine wave buffer instead of a buffer like CDCLVC1104/LMK00105 (single ended) or SN65LVDS105/LMK00304 (differential)?

    Alan Langman said:
    Figure 16; although the graph for singled ended only starts at 50MHz.

    That's because input slew rate is important, with a single ended sine wave it is best to have slew rate > 0.15 V/ns.  0.5 V/ns is better.  Higher frequency sine waves improve slew rate, especially when single ended.  Less than 50 MHz sine wave is not recommended.  Solve this by using a buffer which outputs a square wave, but it is possible your clipped sine wave clock will have enough slew rate.

    73,

    Timothy

  • 0 in reply to Timothy T
    Prodigy 20 points

    Hi Timothy

    Thanks so much for your rapid response!

    The reason I am using the CDC3S04 is that I need to provide the 26MHz reference to a RFD2081 and RFFC5071 from RFMD (sorry not TI parts). They recommend clipped sine wave for the reference input.

    Do you have a TI part you can suggest to convert sine wave to square wave for best performance for the LMK03000?

    Thanks!

    Best

    Alan

  • 0 in reply to Alan Langman
    TI__Mastermind 32575 points

    Hi Alan,

    A simple TI device to convert sine wave to square wave is LMH7220 high-speed LVDS comparator.  The LVDS output of LMH7220 should provide a sufficiently fast edges to drive the clock input of LMK03000.

    Regards,
    Alan