This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

[FAQ] Should I use Auto-Bidirectional level-shifters for Fixed directional applications?

FAQ: Logic and Voltage Translation >  Auto-Bidirectional Level-Shifters > Fixed DIR / DIR CNTRL Level-Shifters >> Current FAQ

Do not use auto-bidirectional level-shifters if the below is applicable. Use fixed or direction control level-shifters instead.

  • Long traces with trace lengths > 1/8th of the signal's wavelength, (λ/8).
  • High lumped capacitive loading, typically > 70 pF (unless otherwise noted by the datasheets).
  • Input driver unable to meet datasheet's dc drive-strength requirement and input transition rate requirements.
  • High-speed applications.

                                        

For more information see Do’s and Don’ts for TXB and TXS Voltage Level-Shifters with Edge Rate Accelerators.

See [FAQ] Are there voltage level translation / level shifter device recommendations for the industry standard interfaces like GPIO, SPI, UART, I2C, MDIO, RGMII, I2S etc? for specific recommendations