- Ask a related questionWhat is a related question?A related question is a question created from another question. When the related question is created, it will be automatically linked to the original question.
Hello,
I am trying to utilize the AM6412 symbol in a new design, as found in the Ultra Librarian database below:
https://app.ultralibrarian.com/search?queryText=AM6412
I am using the Mentor software, Design Architect edition.
The problem has to do with the files for the functional pin ordering that I downloaded. When viewing the symbol, the first block appears in
sequential ordering (A1,A2 and so on) with a "1 of 5" denomination. The rest of the blocks appear in the correct formatting, however, the last
of them has a "7 of 8" denomination, as if the final block is actually missing.
It seems to me that there has been a mixup with the functional and sequential symbols of the component.
For the record, I have tried using all 4 variations of the component, for which the symbol is available for download.
Could you kindly provide the correct symbol for the specific component or advise some steps to troubleshoot the issue?
Thanks in advance!
Hello Sreenivasa,
I am Antonis and work together on the same project with Alexandros.
About your comments:
Can you please share the version.
We will get back to you with the exact version as we are expecting a response form the CAD department.
Have you downloaded the database for the EVM and tried opening the design files.
I did download the SK-AM64B design file packet and browsed the schematic. I noticed that the symbol for the processor is nothing like
the symbol that was generated from the files of Ultra Librarian, so that was not very helpful either. I am posting some pictures so that you can have a
look as well. I hope they are clear enough.
The 1st pic is the symbol zoomed out, and the next three are the zoomed in parts. You can see that I have highlighted the strange things
that Alex mentioned in his previous post. Any ideas why that would happen?
I am looking forward to your reply,
Thanks in advance,
Antonis
