Part Number: TUSB211 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TUSB216I , Hi Sir,
could you help check if the schematic and layout are correct? thanks for your great help and support.
Hi,
TUSB215 and TUSB216I EQ and BOOST capability are not the same. TUSB215 does not have as much redriving capability as TUSB216I.
TUSB215 also has CDP controller integrated that is always enabled. FI your design already has a BC 1.2 controller then TUSB215…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TUSB211 , TUSB212 , TUSB216I , TUSB217A , TUSB214 Hi Ti,
Our project Flex2.0 USB2.0 eye pattern test fail as below diagram, we want to add TUSB211 at USB DP/DM paths as re-driver to strengthen its eye but don't know if TUSB211…
Part Number: TUSB211 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TUSB216I Hi,
Would the TUSB211 (placed in the yellow location) be usable for the following topology:
Thanks.
Regards,
Ken.
Hi,
TUSB216I has some update for Eye diagram testing, TUSB216 and TUSB216I have the same performance outside compliance testing. I recommend using TUSB216I. I am not sure on MFI testing specifically, If customer is replacing TUSB217-Q1 with TUSB216-Q1…
Part Number: TUSB211 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TUSB217A , TUSB216I , TUSB212 Hi Team,
With reference to the below E2E thread, wanted to understand if the Table attached in the thread regarding Boost settings is applicable for TUSB211 as well?
Also…
Yes, the TUSB211 can be replaced by the TUSB216I: https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slla558/slla558.pdf
The signals must be shorted under the device for good signal quality.
Regards,
JMMN
Hi Hide,
Customer should use TUSB216I on both sides for long cable application to maintain good signal quality. Functionally there is no issue with shorter cable. TUSB216I will not impact FS signals, I have not looked specifically at FS with 12m cable…