It is hard to believe that a design aid as poor as "VOLT-DIVIDER-CALC" should exist on TI's otherwise excellent web site.
1) The first thing I noticed is that it often gives answers that are plain wrong. For example when I asked to divide 60 volts down to 1 volt using E24 resistors, it offers 75K and 1.3K giving a 2.2% error. However, using 33k and 560 ohms would give an error of just 0.1%. So it fails in its primary duty: to find optimal resistor pairs.
2) It cannot offer resistors for a 100:1 ratio or more, that is out of range. Why? That is a most typical resistor ratio that one might need.
3) Its lack of capability is disappointing. For example one cannot ask it to select resistors from the superset of E24 and E96. Usually, whenever E96 resistors are available, so are E24 resistors. Almost always, an optimal divider ratio will come from combining the two ranges. For example, if I need a 30:1 voltage divider, 348K and 12K have zero ratio error, but the best that the tool can suggest has a 0.4% error.
This tool has the level of sophistication I would expect from an overnight assignment for a 6th grade beginners programming school class, yet it is offered to professional engineers as a design aid. To be useful, it should offer more than such a minimum capability. For example, engineers are often willing to add a third resistor, either in series or in parallel with one of the resistors in order to get a satisfactorily low initial error. Such a tool should offer optimal 3-resistor solutions. Another frequent need is to find three or more resistors with a given ratio, like 1:9:90 or 1:2:4:8. Another normal requirement is to be able to specify minimum or maximum acceptable resistor values. But this tool offers nothing but the barest minimum, and even that has bugs.
Maybe someone at TI could spend a day or so writing a useful tool, or at least correcting the actual bugs. Or maybe someone in this forum would like to write and post a more serious resistor selection design aid.
It would certainly be good to have some feedback from TI themselves to the issues raised here.