OPA1S2384: op-amp selection

Part Number: OPA1S2384
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA615, OPA860, OPA1S2385

Tool/software:

Hi team,

The customers want to select an op-amp and the requirement is as below:

Differential signal to single-ended signal
3.3V supply,
input signal differential swing 550mV
Bandwidth 80Mhz
Input signal impedance 100ohm

I think that OPA1S2384 is an option. And do you have better suggestion?

  • Hello Hale,

    I will get an update to this thread to you by the end of the day today in Arizona.  

    I believe I have the key information I need to recommended a few devices; does your customer have any priority preference for any of the following features?

    - integrated switches/switching

    - Low Vos and Vos drift

    - Rail-to-rail inputs and/or outputs

    - Higher slew rate

    - Lower noise

    I did notice your input impedance of 100 Ohms request; most of our high-speed amplifiers will have high-impedance inputs relative to the rest of the circuit.  Is there a particular signal standard or first stage circuit I should be aware of when making a recommendation?

    Best,

    Alec

  • Alec,

    The customer requirement is included sample and hold function. And the other requirement is as above:

    3.3V supply,
    input signal differential swing 550mV
    Bandwidth 80Mhz
    Input signal impedance 100ohm

    Please help make sure whether OPA1S2384  is the best option

  • Alec

    Is there a particular signal standard or first stage circuit I should be aware of when making a recommendation?

    No specific signal. Just follow above requirement is enough.

  • Hello Hale,

    The OPA1S2384 remains an option for your customer.  I also have seen prior support on projects for sample & hold with the OPA860 and OPA615:

    OPA860: OPA860 sample& hold circuit - Amplifiers forum - Amplifiers - TI E2E support forums

    I do have an older document which details the sample & hold circuit design & implementation process, but we would use either the OPA860 or OPA1S2384 in place of the older amplifiers within the article:

    https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snoa603/snoa603.pdf

    I will take another look later today once I have a break from projects & meetings.  At the moment I believe you have a good product selection for the design.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hello Hale,

    I did miss the S&H section in the OPA1S2384 datasheet.  We have the OPA1S2385 which has inverted logic for the internal switch compared to the OPA1S2384.

    Either of these parts would appear to be good recommendations for your customer's system.

    If I may ask, which customer are you supporting here on this project?

    Best,

    Alec

  • Alec,

    So the option is opa860, OPA1S2384 and OPA1S2385. Could you help make comparison and show the differences?

    This requirement is from Sourcephotonics which is the optical module supplier. And it's also my first time to know this kind of requirement.  It's pre-research.

  • Hello Hale,

    I will compose a comparison for you.  Together we can help support the customer and work towards design-in and WIN.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hi Alec,

    Please help provide the comparison with us. Thanks.

  • Hello Hale,

    I will provide the comparison by end of day today.  I apologize for any delay.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hello Hale,

    Please find my comparison below:

    sample_and_hold_comparison.xlsx

    The key differences between OPA1S2384/5 and OPA860/1 are here:

    - OPA860/1 are OTA, or operational transconductance amplifiers.  They are primarily intended for laser drivers and transimpedance applications, but can be used in S&H circuits.

    - OPA1S2384/5 are nearly identical devices, with the only difference being whether the internal switch is active HIGH or active LOW.

    - OPA1S2384/5 are also designed for transimpedance applications, but have an entire detailed section in the datasheet supporting sample & hold applications.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hi Alec,

    The customer want to use OPA1S2384 devices. But we have a little confused about this device.

    1. What's the SC control signal voltage? How long does it take from 0V to high level logic voltage? Can GPIO give the signal toSC?

    2.Could you help provide the close loop gain bandwidth when gain is 10?

    In below picture, the bandwidth is 90Mhz

    And in below picture, the bandwidth is 10Mhz

    What's the condition differences? And the customer need 40hz, what's the typical gain bandwidth when gain =10?

  • Hello Hale,

    1. The SC control signal voltage is defined by the SPST switch parameters listed on the front page of the datasheet.  As seen in the block diagram, the SC (switch control) pin operates the SPST switch internal to the device.  In the Absolute Maximum Ratings table the digital ratings of the pin are described.  Additionally the details are explained in the Electrical Characteristics: Switch Section.  The SC pin is the control signal for the switch; the turn-on time for the switch is 20ns under the datasheet conditions.  The minimum digital levels (as for the GPIO operation) are 2.4V for Vs=5V and 2.0V for Vs=3.3V for logic HIGH.  For logic LOW the maximum voltage is 0.9V, with GND (0V) being normal operation.

    2. The 90MHz in the table is for a capacitive load (common for OPA1S2384 circuits).  This capacitive load causes peaking in the gain response and pushes out the 3-dB rolloff point from 10MHz to 90MHz in G=10 configuration.  As 10MHz is the 3-dB bandwidth for G=10 in the datasheet, the GBWP is ~100MHz in those conditions.  As your circuit is operating much slower at 40Hz, you will be below the gain at any common gain configuration.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hi Alec,

    So *if the customer application is no capacitance load, the GBWP is 10MHz and it can't meet their requirement. Is that right?

  • Hello Hale,

    Is the customer requirement 40Hz or 40MHz?  The OPA1S2384 can likely be used unless the bandwidth required is in excess of the available bandwidth in a gain of 10V/V.

    Please confirm the operating frequency and bandwidth for the customer circuit.  Please also confirm the required gain (10V/V?) and if the customer would be willing to use a gain stage prior to the OPA1S2834 if the bandwidth is not sufficient for all of the gain to be on the S&H stage.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hi Alec,

    Thanks for your explanation about SC signal.

    And about the 90Mhz bandwidth in capacitive load application and 10Mhz bandwidth in fig 6, I am still confused. Because if we add capacity load to the op-amp, it will reduce the bandwidth. But from current datasheet, it seems that capacity load enhance the bandwidth. It's weird. Please help check about the bandwidth issue in below condition. I am still confused about the differences.

  • Hello Hale,

    I will look to find a good resource for the explanation.

    For what I can explain now, the higher capacitance loading causes gain peaking in the frequency response.  For example, a capacitive load may cause 2-dB of gain peaking, which results in the gain response 'peaking' up towards 2-dB on a normalized curve like Fig.6 above.

    This peaking then has to come back down to 0-dB and eventually attenuate out at high frequencies.  However, because of the peaking, the bandwidth is 'extended' as the amplifier has a resulting gain response which must decay/decrease from the now higher gain peak.  This extends the bandwidth to higher frequencies, as the frequencies required for the gain roll-off are greater with peaking than for a flat response.  

    If I cannot find a good description or video, I will work on drawing a simple diagram for you on my own.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hi Alec,

    Could you help share the phase frequency, amplitude frequency graph in different capacity load and resistor load with me?

  • Hello Hale,

    Figures 10,11 & 12 of the OPA1S2384 should cover gain vs. RL and gain vs. CL.  The only phase curve I have is in Figure 5.

    Best,

    Alec

  • Hello Hale,

    Do you still require support on this project?  Is the customer satisfied and using the OPA1S2384 in their design?

    Best,

    Alec