This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CDCE62005: Issue Locking PLL in CDCE62005

Part Number: CDCE62005

I am in the process of debugging a board that was built with the CDCE62005 clock generator IC.  The IC is used to generate several clocks.  At the moment, I am only debugging one of the clock outputs; a 400 MHz LVDS clock. 

Earlier in the debugging process, I was able to get the clock generator to successfully output a 125 MHz, LVDS clock as a quick test.  A primary input clock of 10MHz, which is divided by 2, is used as a reference clock.

When I attempt to generate the 400 MHz clock, I am not able to get the PLL to lock.  Based on the divider parameters that I am using, the frequency of the VCO is 2 kHz, which suggests that the VCO should be set to the low range.  However, clock frequency seems to be closer to 400 MHz if the high range is used instead. 

I am using the internal loop filter.  After seeing some previous posts concerning PLL lock and the values for the loop filter, I used Web Bench to generate a new set of resistor and capacitor values for the loop filter.  However, I did not notice any change.

Here are the latest register values that I am using to set the 400 MHz clock.  Note that I am first bringing up the clock generator to output the 125 MHz clock.  A manual calibration is then initiated, which results in a PLL lock.  Next, the registers are reconfigured for the 400 MHz clock and a manual calibration is then initiated.  However, this does not result in a PLL lock.

Reg            Value

0                 E9 40 03 10

1                 68 00 00 00

2                 68 00 00 00

3                 68 00 00 00

4                 68 00 03 10

5                 78 08 0F 00

6                 80 FE 1B 80    (Set to 84 4E 1B 80 to begin manual calibration)

7                 BC 04 7D 60

Any assistance would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Todd