This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In my original design, I am using AM26LV31I to drive the receiver AM2632I with both 3.3V on its VCC. These two ICs are used in Delta-sigma modulator AM1303M2520D with a signal frequency 20 MHz. The total PCB traces length is less than 10 cm.
For some reason, the operating temperature of 85 oC is not enough. Then, I used AM26C31Q and AM26C32Q to replace onboard AM26LV31I and AM2632I. I have surprised that these two ICs are working well.
Can I supply 3.3V to the VCC of AM26C31Q and C32Q? Is there any effect I should aware of?
At 5 V, correct operation is guaranteed. At 3.3 V, there is no guarantee. (And the guaranteed speed of the AM26C31 is only 10 Mbps.) I do not know what you mean with "working well", but you should check the waveform with an oscilloscope.
The cheapest alternative would be the AM26LV31E-EP/AM26LV32E-EP.
This is the 1Y output of AM26C31Q with VCC 3.3V. There is a 120 Ohm termination resistor at the receiver's input.
This signal looks fine.
Try again at the highest temperature you actually need to support. And as I said, there is no guarantee.
Wilson,
Please note that the receiver threshold is about 200mV. Even the output voltage with a 3.3V supply doesn't meet the RS-422 standard. The system might still work. However like Clemens said, TI doesn't guarantee the performance with 3.3V.
What's factor makes the AM26LV31 can runs at 32 Mbps while AM26C31 runs at 10Mbps?
The AM26C31 was designed as a replacement for the AM26LS31, so I guess nobody bothered to test it with more than 10 Mbps.
Wilson,
The maximum data rate is governed by the driver's rise/fall time. AM26C31 is 5ns typical, while AM26LV31 is 3ns.