This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

MSP430FR2672: Driven Shield Performance Verification

Part Number: MSP430FR2672
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA357

Hello,

I am working on a touch implementation with a driven shield. It is detailed in the related post. I now have my PCBAs and am seeing some non ideal shield performance.

I am using the OPA357AIDBVR that shares a 3.3V supply with the MSP430.

What I am seeing is:

1. The shield lags the touch element by 8ns on the rising edge.

2. I am seeing the touch element overshoot the 3.3V rail.

3. The OPA357 output is 0.111V below my rail voltage despite being a RIRO CMOS device.

4. On the falling edge there is significant ringing, and again some lag. However, there appears to be more drive strength in the falling edge vs rising as to be expected.

Main question is if this matches other implementations that you have seen?

Secondary questions:

1. Should I move the OPA357 to a 5V rail to achieve a 1:1 voltage at the top of the waveform, or is a 0.11V delta acceptable?

2. Is the ringing on the bottom edge caused by the shield capacitively coupling to the touch element and driving it below what appears to be a diode reference? What is this low voltage reference and is noise at this stage problematic to the measurement?

3. Are the rise times and setup delays what you would expect?

I do not have a reference design in front of me to measure for comparison.

Best,
Adam

  • You are charging the external capacitor seen as below, using a driven shield. If the voltage of two sides of external capacitor are same, the influence of external capcitor can be ignored. So the mismach will makes you need to take the external capcitor into consideration. However, all of this need to see the final performance is whether accpetable.

    1. For the first question, it depends on whether the sensivity meet your requirement

    2. The low level reference voltage refers to this. It will charge the capacitor to 3.3V and discharge it to 0.5V and move the engry to the internal capacitor. So I think you don't need to consider about the noise, you only need to consider about the engry.

    3. The delay time is acceptable, when the voltage can charge to 3.3V and discharge to 0.5V.

**Attention** This is a public forum